​​​

Proposed Revision Request Detail Help
PRR Life Cycle*****Stakeholder Meeting on Recommendation****
PRR Details
PRR #
1704
Title Update to meter inspection policy and market results interface-settlements access
Date Submitted 8/26/2026 11:51 AM
PRR Category A
Priority Normal
Owner Namburi, Priyanka (CAISO)
Status Stakeholder Meeting on Recommendation
Status End Date 10/13/2026 11:59 PM
Related BPM Metering
BPM Section
3.2.3.3, 7.1 and 7.2

RSS Subscribe
Existing Language

​New language added 

Proposed Language

Updated Section

3.2.3.3 Inspection by CAISO Authorized Inspectors
Updated Section
7.1 CAISO Metered Entities
Updated Section
7.2 Scheduling Coordinator Metered Entities​

​

Reason For Revision

Change in process for provisioning access to MRI-S

Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter

Namburi, Priyanka (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator

​Proceeding with the PRR as submitted, No changes required.​

Identification of the authorship of comments

N/A
Action

Approve the BPM PRR as submitted

Proceed as submitted
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR

N/A
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change

N/A
Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR

10/1/2026
Other recommended actions

N/A
Announcements
No Announcements has been posted for this PRR.
Impact Analysis
Initial Comments
-Will new AIM functionality be deployed to manage authorized users? If so, please describe the implementation timeline and whether there will be any available user acceptance testing.
-Will User Access Administrators receive the ability to independently grant access within AIM, or will endorsed-user requests continue to require CAISO processing and approval?
-Please clarify who is responsible for submitting, reviewing, and approving additions, removals, or other changes to the authorized user list, and whether these responsibilities reside with the resource owner or scheduling coordinator.
-Please clarify whether periodic recertification of the authorized user list will be required and, if so, identify the recertification frequency and the parties responsible for reviewing and approving continued access.
-Will AIM provide role-based access controls that distinguish between UAAs who may view the authorized user list and users who may modify the list?
9/15/2026 4:20 PM
Logged By - alan.meck@pge.com (CAISO)
---------------------------------------------
-Will new AIM functionality be deployed to manage authorized users? If so, please describe the implementation timeline and whether there will be any available user acceptance testing.
ISO Response: 
There will be no changes to the Access Identity Management (AIM) tool.  Changes are in process only.
Each User Access Administrator must agree to the ISO User Access Administrator (UAA) Establishment and Requirements, as part of their responsibilities as a UAA.  This was established with the creation of the UAA role and has not changed. 
Implementation for the process change is scheduled for November 1, 2026.
_____________
-Will User Access Administrators receive the ability to independently grant access within AIM, or will endorsed-user requests continue to require CAISO processing and approval?
ISO Response:
UAA role and AIM User Guide will remain the same.  UAAs will be able to grant access to MRI-S within AIM without the need for validation by the ISO.  Endorsed User access functionality will remain the same. 
____________
-Please clarify who is responsible for submitting, reviewing, and approving additions, removals, or other changes to the authorized user list, and whether these responsibilities reside with the resource owner or scheduling coordinator.
ISO Response:
The UAA will continue to be responsible for setting up users, submitting, reviewing, and approving access requests and access removals.
Third party users will no longer need to be indicated within the Meter Service Agreement for Scheduling Coordinators (MSASC) or resource owner’s Meter Service Agreement for CAISO Metered Entities (MSACAISOME).
__________


-Please clarify whether periodic recertification of the authorized user list will be required and, if so, identify the recertification frequency and the parties responsible for reviewing and approving continued access.
ISO Response:
As indicated in the response above, authorized users will no longer be indicated in the Metering Agreements.  UAAs will be responsible for establishing access for users, including any applicable third party users.

-Will AIM provide role-based access controls that distinguish between UAAs who may view the authorized user list and users who may modify the list?
ISO Response:
UAA responsibilities will remain the same.

9/17/2026 2:14 PM
Responded By - Namburi, Priyanka (CAISO)
Recommendation Comments
No Recommendation Comments available for this PRR.
Attachments