You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
LOGIN
BPM
Home
Currently selected
Stakeholder Meetings
Agenda/Presentation
Contact BPM Change Manager
FAQ
BPM Document Library
ViewPRR
Business Practice Manual Change Management
Page Content
Proposed Revision Request Detail
PRR Life Cycle
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Closed
PRR Details
PRR #
986
Title
Update resource adequacy availability incentive mechanism assessment hours
Date Submitted
4/10/2017 9:46 AM
PRR Category
A
Priority
Normal
Owner
Katta, Gautham (CAISO)
Status
Closed
Status End Date
7/12/2017 12:00 AM
Related BPM
Reliability Requirements
BPM Section
Section 7; page 98
Subscribe
Existing Language
Please check page 98
Proposed Language
Please check page 98
Reason For Revision
The change is due to the flex assessment study.
Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter
Katta, Gautham (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator
Based on PG&E's comments and other stakeholder concerns, the ISO will keep the assessment hours in the RR BPM. A revised redline will be posted soon.
Identification of the authorship of comments
Based on PG&E's comments and other stakeholder concerns, the ISO will keep the assessment hours in the RR BPM. A revised redline will be posted soon.
Action
Facilitate further open meeting discussions on the submitted BPM PRR at a subsequent stakeholder meeting
Based on PG&E's comments and other stakeholder concerns, the ISO will keep the assessment hours in the RR BPM. A revised redline will be posted soon.
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR
NA
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change
NA
Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR
7/1/2017
Other recommended actions
NA
Click here to view the Final Decision for this PRR
Final Decision
The Availability Assessment Hour (AAH) will not change for 2018. ISO has posted a final BPM to the BPM Library that contains the AAH hours for 2017 & 2018.
Stakeholder Comment
NA
Effective Date
7/1/2017
Action
Adopt the recommendation as modified
NA
Announcements
Correction to Previous Announcement: The AAH will not change for 2018. The 2018 hours will remain same as 2017. ISO has posted the final BPM to the BPM Library that contains hours for 2017 and 2018.
Posted On - 6/27/2017 12:35 PM
The AAH will not change for 2018, the 2018 hours will remain same as 2017. ISO will post the final BPM which will contain hours for 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Posted On - 6/27/2017 10:40 AM
PRR 986 has been moved back into Recommendation Comment period to allow comments on the Redlined BPM, version 3 attached at the bottom of this PRR.
1) ISO agrees to stakeholder feedback about keeping the availability assessment hour (AAH) in
the BPM.
a. ISO posted a new redline v3 which includes the AAH for generic and flexible RA for 2017
and 2018.
2) ISO also included the methodology used to calculate the hours in the new redline version.
3) ISO has set up a stakeholder meeting on 6/6 – (market notice will be posted within a
week) “2018 Annual Review of Determination of Availability Assessment Hours” to discuss
the change in the hours and the methodology used.
4) ISO has moved this PRR in to a comment period and will use the 6/6 meeting to go over the
details and questions from stakeholders.
Posted On - 5/23/2017 8:00 AM
New version posted.
AAH for generic RA and Flexible RA will remain in the BPM.
Posted On - 5/18/2017 2:24 PM
Impact Analysis
Impact Analysis not available.
Initial Comments
PG&E oppose this change as we feel the RAAIM assessment hours should be defined in the BPM. If there are changes to the assessment hours after the assessment studies (generic and flexible), market participants should have an opportunity to review and provide feedback when changes are done through the BPM process.
4/25/2017 10:51 AM
Logged By - Abigail Seto (Energy Procurement - Portfolio Management)
Recommendation Comments
JDRPs Protest of PRR 986 June 13, 2017.pdf
Joint DR Parties comments on PRR 986, submitted on June 13, 2017
6/13/2017 4:46 PM
Logged By - Mona Tierney-Lloyd (Joint DR Parties)
NRG Comments on PRR 986 170613.pdf
NRG Energy, Inc. Comments on PRR 986
6/13/2017 11:55 AM
Logged By - Brian Theaker (NRG Energy)
SCE Comments on PRR 986.pdf
Southern California Edison Comment on PRR 986
6/6/2017 8:10 AM
Logged By - Payton, Julia (CAISO)
CPUC Staff Comments on PRR 986_.docx
CPUC Comment on PRR 986
6/5/2017 6:32 PM
Logged By - Payton, Julia (CAISO)
JDRP's Protest to CAISO PRR 986.pdf
JDRP's Opposition to PRR 986.
6/5/2017 5:15 PM
Logged By - Mona Tierney-Lloyd (Joint DR Parties)
PGE Comments to PRR986 (Availability Assessment Hours).pdf
Please see PG&E's comments in the attachment.
6/5/2017 5:10 PM
Logged By - Abigail Seto (Energy Procurement - Portfolio Management)
PRR 986 CLECA comments 5-31-17.pdf
CLECA comments in opposition to change in AAH for system and local RA.
5/31/2017 11:52 AM
Logged By - brbarkovich (CLECA)
SDG&E appreciates the CAISO agreeing to leave the RAAIM Availability Assessment Hours in the BPM.
SDG&E recommends the CAISO to provide more detail surrounding its methodology and analysis of the 2018 Availability Assessment Hours.
Specifically, what load hours were used in the analysis? Did the analysis use the previous 3 years (2014 - 2016)? Did the CAISO consider using 2018 forecasted load hours that were used in the Flexible RA Availability Assessment Hours?
Did the CAISO consider making the summer and winter months consistent across the Availability Assessment Hours for System, Local and Flexible RA.
Did the CAISO consider using Load with behind the meter PV excluded instead of looking Load with behind the meter PV?
SDG&E believes the CAISO should include a date each year, in which it shall provide the analysis and publish the Availability Assessment Hours for the following compliance year.
Finally, SDG&E recommends the CAISO to extend the window to provide comments beyond June 5th so that stakeholders may provide additional comments after the June 6th meeting.
SDG&E looks forward to the discussion on June 6th.
5/23/2017 7:58 PM
Logged By - Nuo Tang (SDG&E) (San Diego Gas & Electric Company)
PRR 986 California Large Energy Consumers Association Comments 5.docx
5/16/2017 3:42 PM
Logged By - brbarkovich (CLECA)
---------------------------------------------
Thanks for the feedback. The AAH will remain in the BPM.
ISO will host a stakeholder meeting to review AAH and changes for 2018 RA year.
5/18/2017 2:27 PM
Responded By - Katta, Gautham (CAISO)
Click here to view the Appeals for this PRR
Click on the '+' icon to submit a New Appeal
# of Appeals In Progress - 0
# of Appeals Closed - 0
# of Appeals Abandoned - 0
There are no Appeals on this PRR.
Attachments