​​​

Proposed Revision Request Detail Help
PRR Life Cycle*****Stakeholder Meeting on Recommendation****
PRR Details
PRR #
1657
Title Clarifying real-time test requirement and adding section for contact list requirements
Date Submitted 11/24/2025 6:48 AM
PRR Category B
Priority Normal
Owner Hines, Nicole (CAISO)
Status Stakeholder Meeting on Recommendation
Status End Date 1/27/2026 11:59 PM
Related BPM Scheduling Coordinator Certification and Termination
BPM Section Added section 5.3.9
Updated section 5.3.8
Updated section 3
Updated exhibit 3-11
RSS Subscribe
Existing Language

​See Attached

Proposed Language

​​See Attached
 

Reason For Revision

​​​The reason for this revision is to add clarity to the existing real time desk testing process and to define new process for annual confirmation of contact information.

Second update to definition of inter SC trades to match the CAISO Tariff definition.  (added 12/10/2025)

Effective date 2/1/2026​

Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter

Hines, Nicole (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator

​Updated exhibit 3-11 to include MSA for inter SC Trades
Updated section 3 to keep language about contract requirements


Identification of the authorship of comments

6 Cities
Action

Approve the BPM PRR as modified.

Updated exhibit 3-11 to include MSA for inter SC Trades
Updated section 3 to keep language about contract requirements
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR

Kept language from initial submission to include the contract requirements listed.
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change

Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR

Other recommended actions

Announcements
No Announcements has been posted for this PRR.
Impact Analysis
PRR Impact Analysis Form 1657.docx    
Notes:
Initial Comments
The description of the purpose for this PRR states that it is intended to add clarity to the existing real-time desk testing process and to define a new process for confirmation of contact information.  However, the attachment to the PRR includes a proposed language change in § 3 at page 12 that is not described in the purpose section and appears to change the substance of Scheduling Coordinator obligations.  The Six Cities request that the CAISO explain the purpose and need for the language revisions shown in § 3 of the attachment.
12/9/2025 1:11 PM
Logged By - Bonnie Blair (Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA)
---------------------------------------------
Thank you for your comment. We will add this to the reason for revision as it was missed when PRR was being submitted. The definition was updated and not ment to change any obligations for scheduling coordinators, but an administrative one to keep the definition the same as Appendix A of the CAISO Tariff.

The second update reason for that paragraph was due to all scheduling coordinators are required to sign an SCA and MSA, not just an SCA.

Please let us know if you have additional questions.
Thank you
12/10/2025 11:07 AM
Responded By - Hines, Nicole (CAISO)
Recommendation Comments
No Recommendation Comments available for this PRR.
Attachments