You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
LOGIN / REGISTER
BPM
Home
Currently selected
Stakeholder Meetings
Agenda/Presentation
Contact BPM Change Manager
FAQ
BPM Document Library
ViewPRR
Business Practice Manual Change Management
Page Content
Proposed Revision Request Detail
PRR Life Cycle
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Closed
PRR Details
PRR #
1501
Title
Updates details and requirements for hybrid dynamic limits
Date Submitted
4/3/2023 11:13 AM
PRR Category
A
Priority
Normal
Owner
Rugh, Michael (CAISO)
Status
Closed
Status End Date
7/19/2023 11:59 PM
Related BPM
Market Operations
BPM Section
2.1.21
Subscribe
Existing Language
See attached.
Proposed Language
See attached.
Reason For Revision
This edit seeks to add additional guidance and details around Hybrid Dynamic Limits and submitting Hybrid Dynamic Limits.
Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter
Rugh, Michael (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator
Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Identification of the authorship of comments
Action
Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Approve as modified
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR
NA
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change
NA
Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR
May 30, 2023
Other recommended actions
NA
Click here to view the Final Decision for this PRR
Final Decision
Approve original
Stakeholder Comment
Effective Date
Action
Adopt the recommendation as originally issued
Announcements
No Announcements has been posted for this PRR.
Impact Analysis
Impact Analysis not available.
Initial Comments
SRP appreciates the opportunity to comment on PRR 1501. SRP is requesting the CAISO clarify ‘participating hybrid resources’ if hybrid dynamic limits are not required for non-participating hybrid resources with a base schedule. Additionally, SRP understands a change to the BPM includes that hybrid dynamic limits may not be used to avoid curtailment of the VER component of a hybrid resource. SRP request the CAISO provide information with respect to how the CAISO will evaluate the use of hybrid dynamic limits of hybrid resource and that the CAISO provide claritiy as to whether it will be verifying if the lower hybrid dynamic limit is at or below zero. SRP recommends the CAISO to make clear the consequences when it is determined an entitiy has leveraged hybrid dynamic limits to avoid curtailment of a hybrid resource VER component. Further, SRP encourages the CAISO to make clear the intended functionality of the lower limit and whether an entity raise the lower hybrid dynamic limit above zero to force a minimum amount of energy.
5/16/2023 5:40 PM
Logged By - Jerret Fischer (SRP)
---------------------------------------------
Thank you for your comment. We will make clarifications around participating hybrid resources and added some language about how misuse of hybrid dynamic limits will be dealt with. CAISO generally doesn't commit to monitoring and consequences, but our Department of Market Monitoring will investigate any perceived misuse of the market.
The intended functionality of the hybrid dynamic limits is to reflect the actual operating range of the hybrid resource within a specific time interval based on the VER component forecast and the storage component SOC. We believe the current BPM language is clear on this point as it states the hybrid dynamic limits cannot be used to avoid curtailment on the VER component.
5/30/2023 3:40 PM
Responded By - Rugh, Michael (CAISO)
Recommendation Comments
No Recommendation Comments available for this PRR.
Click here to view the Appeals for this PRR
Click on the '+' icon to submit a New Appeal
# of Appeals In Progress - 0
# of Appeals Closed - 0
# of Appeals Abandoned - 0
There are no Appeals on this PRR.
Attachments