You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
LOGIN / REGISTER
BPM
Home
Currently selected
Stakeholder Meetings
Agenda/Presentation
Contact BPM Change Manager
FAQ
BPM Document Library
ViewPRR
Business Practice Manual Change Management
Page Content
Proposed Revision Request Detail
PRR Life Cycle
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Closed
PRR Details
PRR #
1154
Title
Resourse Adequacy Availability Incentive Mechanism Exemption Updates
Date Submitted
4/22/2019 12:21 PM
PRR Category
C
Priority
Normal
Owner
Woody, Kyle (CAISO)
Status
Closed
Status End Date
8/20/2019 11:59 PM
Related BPM
Reliability Requirements
BPM Section
9.2.2 and 9.3.3
Subscribe
Existing Language
See attached BPM
Proposed Language
See attached BPM
Reason For Revision
Tariff filing
Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter
Woody, Kyle (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator
Please see attached "Revised" BPM.
Identification of the authorship of comments
n/a
Action
Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Based off comments from market participants the original BPM language has been modified and can be found under attachments as "Revised".
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR
n/a
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change
n/a
Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR
7/22
Other recommended actions
n/a
Click here to view the Final Decision for this PRR
Final Decision
The BPM has been approved as revised.
Stakeholder Comment
N/A
Effective Date
8/6/2019
Action
Adopt the recommendation as modified
N/A
Announcements
The ISO posted a revised version of the redlined BPM and posted the response to comments and
recommendation.
Posted On - 7/16/2019 4:42 PM
The ISO has place PRR 1154 on hold pending the review and response to comments and posting of the Recommendation. We anticipate the posting in a couple weeks.
Posted On - 6/20/2019 9:41 AM
The response to initial comments and recommendation posting will be delayed until mid-June, as this will
require further discussion.
Posted On - 5/29/2019 4:23 PM
The revised BPM updated the Forced nature of work for 'New Generator Test Energy' to not require substitution.
Posted On - 5/7/2019 8:07 AM
Impact Analysis
Impact Analysis not available.
Initial Comments
NRG PRR 1154 Inital Comments.pdf
NRG Energy, Inc. Initial Comments on BPM CM 1154
5/16/2019 7:06 AM
Logged By - Brian Theaker (NRG Energy)
---------------------------------------------
To the extent that there are concerns regarding the determined opportunity costs not binding for use limited resources, please refer to the “use limit reached” outage cards. The “environmental restrictions” outage card is not intended to be a catch all outage card that provides substitution and RAAIM exemptions.
In regard to this languag being in the bpm and not the tariff, FERC has approved several tariff provisions that allow the ISO to defer certain details to the relevant BPM. This is one of those provisions.
7/16/2019 1:59 PM
Responded By - Woody, Kyle (CAISO)
190514_PGE_Comments_PRR1154.pdf
5/14/2019 1:44 PM
Logged By - winichen (ISO & FERC Relations)
---------------------------------------------
The CAISO’s implementation of tariff section 40.9.3.4(d) must be guided by the principle that the tariff does not guarantee a RAAIM exemption for every outage beyond the generator’s control. The RAAIM exemption, instead, is tied to specific nature of work categories. In identifying a nature of work as RAAIM exempt, the CAISO needs to be comfortable that every (or virtually every) outage reported in that category meets one of the three factors identified in section 40.9.3.4(d). The CAISO is not confident that the “environmental restrictions” nature of work meets this standard. PG&E’s example of condor curtailments conceivably could be framed as an outage outside the resource’s control but that is not relevant to a wind resource because they already are categorically exempt from RAAIM. PG&E’s example of restrictions on burning diesel, however, is a case of an outage within the generator’s control. An emissions limitation is not exogenous to the resource because those restrictions only curtail output to the extent a given resource emits. In PG&E’s specific example, if the initial gas system outage falls within the scope of issues covered by the RAAIM-exempt “Ambient Not Due to Temp” nature of work, then once the diesel emission limitations foreclose further operations the resource could report the outage under that exempt nature of work for as long as the qualifying gas system limitations remain in place. Otherwise, the outage properly would be reported under either the “Environmental Restrictions” or “Ambient due to Fuel insufficiency” outage types.
7/16/2019 9:48 AM
Responded By - Woody, Kyle (CAISO)
Recommendation Comments
No Recommendation Comments available for this PRR.
Click here to view the Appeals for this PRR
Click on the '+' icon to submit a New Appeal
# of Appeals In Progress - 0
# of Appeals Closed - 0
# of Appeals Abandoned - 0
There are no Appeals on this PRR.
Attachments