You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
LOGIN / REGISTER
BPM
Home
Currently selected
Stakeholder Meetings
Agenda/Presentation
Contact BPM Change Manager
FAQ
BPM Document Library
ViewPRR
Business Practice Manual Change Management
Page Content
Proposed Revision Request Detail
PRR Life Cycle
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Closed
PRR Details
PRR #
1577
Title
Three unrelated corrections and clarifications
Date Submitted
6/24/2024 10:44 AM
PRR Category
A
Priority
Normal
Owner
Martin, Michael (CAISO)
Status
Closed
Status End Date
10/15/2024 11:59 PM
Related BPM
Market Operations
BPM Section
2.1.13 Non-Generator Resources
2.5.7 Reliability Demand Response Dispatch and Real-time Price
6.6.5 Adjustment of Non-Priced Quantities in IFM
Subscribe
Existing Language
See Attached
Proposed Language
See Attached
Reason For Revision
Corrections to the Market Operations BPM including:
RDRR cleared Economic Hourly Block Bids are not eligible for Bid Cost Recovery
Corrected a typo and inadvertent error where the Minimum Effectiveness Threshold should be two-tenth of a percent (0.2%) (not 2%)
NGRs with resource adequacy capacity that do not use regulation energy management
do not
have a requirement to submit $0/MW availability bids in the RUC.
Click here to view the Recommendation Details for this PRR
BPM PRR Submitter
Martin, Michael (CAISO)
Modified BPM language proposed by the PBM Chnage Management Coordinator
Approve as submitted
Identification of the authorship of comments
NA
Action
Approve the BPM PRR as submitted
NA
Statement of apparent requirements of the BPM PRR
NA
Priority and rank for any BPM PRR requiring a CAISO system change
NA
Proposed effective date(s) of the BPM PRR
NA
Other recommended actions
Click here to view the Final Decision for this PRR
Final Decision
Approve with minor modification suggested that clarified RUC bidding requirements are the same for REM NGR and non REM NGRs
Stakeholder Comment
Approved with recommended changes
Effective Date
Action
Adopt the recommendation as modified
NA
Announcements
These items are also in sync with the upcoming Tariff Clarification Filing planned for early August.
Posted On - 7/15/2024 3:39 PM
Impact Analysis
Impact Analysis not available.
Initial Comments
No Initial Comments available for this PRR.
Recommendation Comments
The Six Cities recommend clarifying the proposed language for PRR 1577 to be consistent with the proposed changes in PRR 1582 summarizing bidding requirements for Non-Generator Resources at pages 88-89 of the BPM for Reliability Requirements. The currrent language for PRR 1577 suggests that there is a distinction in RUC bidding requirements for NGR that engage in REM versus other NGRs. The proposed changes in PRR 1582 show the same RUC bidding requirements for both Non REM NGRs and REM NGRs.
9/11/2024 12:49 PM
Logged By - Bonnie Blair (Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA)
---------------------------------------------
Agree with comment with regard to same treatment on non REM and REM NGRs. CAISO will work to revise.
9/18/2024 10:53 AM
Responded By - Martin, Michael (CAISO)
Click here to view the Appeals for this PRR
Click on the '+' icon to submit a New Appeal
# of Appeals In Progress - 0
# of Appeals Closed - 0
# of Appeals Abandoned - 0
There are no Appeals on this PRR.
Attachments