RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1703

PRR - 1703

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Impact Analysis for PRR - 1703

-By Williamson-Duffney, Joseph on Friday, August 28, 2026 7:53:21 AM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1703

Description: The attachment for this PRR proposes to delete three sentences at the end of § 6.1.5.6 that address cost responsibility for assigned Deliverability Network Upgrades (“DNUs”) for projects that are withdrawn from the interconnection queue due to a failure to meet commercial viability criteria. The deletion of this language does not appear to be directly related to other modifications proposed in the PRR or the described purpose for the PRR. The Six Cities request that the CAISO explain the basis for the proposed deletion of the language regarding DNU cost responsibility.
-By bblair@thompsoncoburn.com on Wednesday, September 16, 2026 2:55:58 PM

Response: The language in this section was updated to reflect that not demonstrating CVC will result in withdrawal of the project from the interconnection queue, which makes the remaining language regarding cost responsibility adjustments for DNUs irrelevant.
-By Jordan, Jill on Thursday, September 17, 2026 9:53:40 AM

Recommendation Comment for PRR - 1703

Description: The attachment for this PRR proposes to delete three sentences at the end of § 6.1.5.6 that address cost responsibility for assigned Deliverability Network Upgrades (“DNUs”) for projects that are withdrawn from the interconnection queue due to a failure to meet commercial viability criteria. The Six Cities submitted an Initial Comment requesting an explanation for the proposed deletion of the language regarding DNU cost responsibility. Upon further consideration and review of the proposed BPM for Resource Interconnection Standards included in PRR 1695, the Six Cities suggest that, to provide additional clarity, the following language be added to the first sentence of § 6.1.5.6: “and subject to any applicable Withdrawal Penalty or forfeitures of deposits.” As recommended by the Six Cities, § 6.1.5.6 would read: “A project that fails to meet or maintain commercial viability criteria will be withdrawn and subject to any applicable Withdrawal Penalty or forfeitures of deposits.”
-By bblair@thompsoncoburn.com on Tuesday, October 13, 2026 3:24:39 PM

Response: The ISO agrees with the proposed langauge and will include it, or something similar, in the final document.
-By Jordan, Jill on Friday, October 16, 2026 12:47:05 PM

Recommendation for PRR - 1703

Proposed Language:

Approve as modified in the attached document

Priority: n/a
Action: Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Effective Date: 01/01/0001