RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1694

PRR - 1694

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Impact Analysis for PRR - 1694

-By Williamson-Duffney, Joseph on Monday, August 3, 2026 9:28:06 AM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1694

Description: Several uses of the phrases “not included” or “not include” create ambiguity in the proposed language for revisions to § 7.1.3.1 of the BPM for the Energy Imbalance Market relating to treatment of FRP awards when a BAA elects to limit its EIM Transfers with a Net ITC constraint. In line 6 of the second paragraph, does “not included” mean “not enforced”? In line 7, does “not include” mean “not support” or “not accommodate”? The Six Cities request that the CAISO modify the proposed language to clarify the proposed revisions.
-By bblair@thompsoncoburn.com on Tuesday, August 18, 2026 3:41:28 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1694

Description: Thank you Bonnie for your suggestions. Please review V2 attached. ~Michael Martin
-By Williamson-Duffney, Joseph on Thursday, August 20, 2026 2:54:57 PM

Recommendation for PRR - 1694

Proposed Language:

Approve the BPM PRR as modified.

Action: Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Effective Date: 01/01/0001