RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1683

PRR - 1683

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Impact Analysis for PRR - 1683

-By Williamson-Duffney, Joseph on Monday, June 29, 2026 9:21:24 AM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1683

Description: LSA comments on this PRR.
-By Susan R. Schneider (Phoenix Consulting) on Friday, July 10, 2026 7:43:14 PM

Response: The ISO will include the edits agreed upon by the ISO and LSA when we post our recommendation.
-By Jordan, Jill on Tuesday, July 21, 2026 3:17:15 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1683

Description: The Six Cities have the following comment and question concerning this PRR: Section 3.2 (page 21) - - In the first paragraph as revised, the last sentence is incomplete. Section 6.5.9.2 (page 74) - - What is the reason for deleting the last paragraph? What happens to the modification assessment deposit?
-By Bonnie Blair (Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA) on Wednesday, July 15, 2026 2:21:21 PM

Response: Section 3.2 - The ISO will correct the last sentence when we post the recommendation. Thank you. Section 6.5.9.2 - The language is being removed as it is not ISO practice to hold the deposit for downsizing modification requests until after the reassessment. The accounting is closed out as per the usual process.
-By Jordan, Jill on Tuesday, July 21, 2026 3:16:28 PM

Recommendation Comment for PRR - 1683

Description: The Six Cities note that the last sentence of the first paragraph in § 3.2 as edited in the Recommendation attachment remains incomplete.
-By Bonnie Blair (Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA) on Tuesday, August 18, 2026 3:27:52 PM

Response: The ISO acknowledges the typo and will ensure it is fixed prior to publishing the updated BPM.
-By Jordan, Jill on Wednesday, August 19, 2026 4:02:55 PM

Recommendation for PRR - 1683

Apparent Requirement: n/a
Priority: n/a
Action: Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Effective Date: 08/28/2026
Other Actions: n/a