RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1682

PRR - 1682

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Impact Analysis for PRR - 1682

-By Martin, Michael on Monday, June 29, 2026 4:12:32 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1682

Description: The Six Cities recommend clarifying the last sentence of the new language proposed for § 9.1.6.2, as follows: “All disputes related to administrative prices implemented pursuant to this section must be filed within the standard settlement dispute timeframes.”
-By Bonnie Blair (Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA) on Wednesday, July 15, 2026 2:18:19 PM

Recommendation for PRR - 1682

Apparent Requirement: NA
Priority: NA
Action: Approve the BPM PRR as modified.
Effective Date:
Other Actions: A version 2 will be posted.