RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1673

PRR - 1673

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Impact Analysis for PRR - 1673

-By Mouanetry, Monica on Monday, May 18, 2026 9:47:25 AM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1673

Description: Below is our response to comment in word doc attached.
-By Meg McNaul (Six Cities) on Tuesday, June 16, 2026 3:41:47 PM

Response: No, as we have five minutely processing as seen for mdhcif where “f” is five minutely vs “c” is 15 minutely frequencies. Thank you
-By Ahmadi, Massih on Thursday, June 18, 2026 8:53:15 AM

Announcement for PRR - 1673

Description: Charge codes updated based on initial comments are contained in the zip file titled "PRR 1673 - updated based on stakeholder feedback.zip"
-By Madrigal, Radha on Monday, July 6, 2026 9:38:18 AM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1673

Description: See ISO response to Six Cities Initial comments in attachment titled "Six Cities Initial Comments on PRR 1673_CAISO_Response_07022026.docx"
-By Madrigal, Radha on Monday, July 6, 2026 9:47:40 AM

Recommendation for PRR - 1673

Proposed Language:

The ISO proposes no modified BPM language beyond that proposed in the BPM PRR.

Apparent Requirement: This BPM PRR contains basic language changes.
Priority: There were implemented system changes associated with this PRR. If system change: The system changes were implemented on 5/1/26 on Emergency basis.
Action: Approve the BPM PRR as submitted
Effective Date:
Other Actions: The ISO does not recommend any other actions on this BPM PRR.