RSS Feed for Proposed Revision Request - 1282

PRR - 1282

Value cannot be null. Parameter name: stream

Announcement for PRR - 1282

Description: PRR 1282 has been made available at this time to allow additional time to review and submit comments. Comment period will close 10/20/2020. PRR will be discussed during the October and November BPM meetings.
-By Hines, Nicole on Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:03:01 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1282

Description: Please find attached the initial comments of the Imperial Irrigation District ("IID") in response to CAISO Business Practice Manual Proposed Revision Request 1282, concerning Scheduling of export resources in real time market.
-By Sean Neal (Imperial Irrigation District) on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 3:26:30 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1282

Description: CPUC Staff Initial Comments on CAISO's BPM PRR 1282
-By Michele Kito (CPUC) on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 4:32:23 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1282

Description: Please see PG&E's attached Initial Comments.
-By Pedram Arani (Pacific Gas & Electric) on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 5:59:33 PM

Response: Please see attached CAISO response
-By Batakji, Jamal on Thursday, August 26, 2021 4:41:42 PM

Initial Comment for PRR - 1282

Description: The CAISO received written comments on 10/20/2020 in reference to PRR 1282 from Andrew Meditz at SMUD. Please see attached.
-By Hines, Nicole on Thursday, October 22, 2020 7:22:36 AM

Announcement for PRR - 1282

Description: PRR 1282 has been put on hold.
-By Hines, Nicole on Tuesday, October 27, 2020 10:07:42 AM

Announcement for PRR - 1282

Description: PRR 1282 has been withdrawn.
-By Hines, Nicole on Tuesday, June 22, 2021 8:55:06 AM

Announcement for PRR - 1282

Description: PRR 1282 has been put back into the commenting phase. Recommendation comment period will close on 8/17/2021.
-By Hines, Nicole on Wednesday, August 4, 2021 7:18:55 AM

Recommendation Comment for PRR - 1282

Description: APS would like to recommend two general changes to this PRR. 1) Address the clarity of priorities of RUC schedules for exports in relation to CAISO load. This was the original reason the item was placed on hold and the initial commenters request clarification be added on priority of exports. Unless captured elsewhere the addition of the outcomes of the Summer Readiness 2021 initiative should be included for clarity. 2) APS also requests transparency of RUC awards when the sink BA is not the scheduling coordinator receiving the RUC award. Today, we are seeing requests from the CAISO BA through RC West to have sink BA's review e-tags vs. RUC awards but this is not possible if another entity is SC receiving the RUC Award. APS would like to request that the CAISO notify sink BA's of RUC awards that are e-tagged without an award since the sink BA's are unable to do so themselves. Thank You.
-By Tyler Moore (Arizona Public Service) on Monday, August 16, 2021 11:31:04 AM

Response: CAISO: Answer to question 1: The CAISO has implemented two main BPM language changes; one specific to clarify the add clarity to the language related to penalty prices. The PRR are 1360 and 1345. CAISO: Answer to question 2: The request is beyond the scope of a BPM language clarification since it is about providing additional data. Given the nature of the data request, the participant is encouraged to bring this request to the ongoing initiative regarding forward scheduling. There is an area under discussion about transparency and this specific request fits in that discussion.
-By Batakji, Jamal on Thursday, August 26, 2021 4:33:15 PM

Final Decision for PRR - 1282

Final Decision: Adopt the recommendation
Stakeholder Comment: Comments submitted, and CAISO posted the responses
Action: Adopt the recommendation as modified
Effective Date: 09/05/2020